GET THE APP

ANALYSIS OF TALENT IDENTIFICATION OF INDONESIAN POTENTIAL ATHLETES IN ATHLETICS IN THE NATIONAL STUDENTS ATHLETICS CHAMPIONSHIP

Ibero-American Journal of Exercise and Sports Psychology

Research Article - (2024) Volume 19, Issue 4

ANALYSIS OF TALENT IDENTIFICATION OF INDONESIAN POTENTIAL ATHLETES IN ATHLETICS IN THE NATIONAL STUDENTS ATHLETICS CHAMPIONSHIP

Rumini1*, Fery Darmanto2, Moch Fahmi Abdulaziz, Bambang Ferianto Tjahyo Kuntjoro4, Vega Chandra Dinata5 and Bayu Budi Prakoso6
*Correspondence: Rumini, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Univeristas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia, Email:
1Faculty of Sport Sciences, Univeristas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
2Faculty of Sport Sciences, Univeristas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
3Faculty of Sport Sciences, Univeristas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
4Faculty of Sport Science and Health, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
5Faculty of Sport Science and Health, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
6Faculty of Sport Science and Health, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia

Received: 10-Aug-2024 Published: 21-Aug-2024

Abstract

This research contributes to the development of talent identification in athletic athletes, especially those from students aged 15-18 years. We identified the potential and need for the development of athletes from students in indonesia. The aim of this research is to analyze students from schools regarding the potential that can be developed, especially those who have motor intelligence which can be channeled into athletics. The use of ex post facto descriptive methods in this research has benefits, one of which is to analyze the factors that occurred which could have caused this phenomenon. The number of participants involved was 142 athletes consisting of 16 men and 18 women in the 100-meter run, 18 men and 18 women in the 1000-meter run, 18 men and 18 women in the long jump, which are the results of selection in 6 provinces in indonesia. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 24. All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Pearson's product moment test was used to determine the correlation between variables and finish time. The significance level for all statistical tests was set at p < 0.05. There is a positive correlation between anthropometric measurements, especially in height, arm span, and leg length, on the results of the 100 and 1000-meter runs, in the long jump, the results of anthropometric measurements are also positively correlated with the final results of the competition, especially in height, arm span, and leg length. Meanwhile, in the shot put, the results of anthropometric measurements which include body weight, height, arm span and leg length are positively correlated with the shot put results, so that the ideal anthropometry average will show maximum results of the competition. Body weight does not correlate with the final results, especially in the 100-meter run, 1000-meter run and shot put competitions. Unlike the shot put, the results of anthropometry measurements influence the results of the competition. These measurement parameters are useful, but on the other hand, training and nutrition intake can also influence the results of competition performance

Keywords

Talent Identification. Athletics. Student Athletics Championship

Introduction

Athletes who have trained diligently for a long time may not be able to achieve maximum results if they are not talented in sports, resulting in a waste of their time and energy (G. Williams et al., 2020) (Ronkainen et al., 2023)(Horne et al., 2022). This is where the importance of talent scouting is needed to identify someone who has potential, skills, and high motivation in sports, so that it can be predicted that they will achieve maximum results. The methods used in the search for identification of talented athletes were natural selection and scientific selection (Zamirovna, 2021; Saward et al., 2020). “Natural Selection” aims to identify potential athletes who have gone through specific sports, so it depends on the individuals participating in sports. Meanwhile, “Scientific Selection” is an active process and procedure of identifying individuals who are skilled in a particular sport. The process itself includes physical, physiological, and psychological, that can affect the athlete’s performance. The advantages of using “natural selection” includes: selecting talented individuals, reducing the extensive amount of time it takes to find athletes suitable for the sport, minimizing the energy and time of the coaches in training the athletes in specific sports, increasing the competitiveness of athletes towards international achievement with other countries (Chunmei, 2021). On the other hand, the results of research on athlete development showed that biological age is more important than chronological age. Another factor is that children who enter adulthood rather early have advanced anthropometric characteristics which include taller, stronger, heavier (Toselli et al., 2021). Thus, it can be interpreted that the success or failure of a young athlete can be influenced by her/his dynamic and multifactorial maturity (Crewther et al., 2024; Junior et al., 2021; Morais et al., 2021). The ages of 12 to 14 are crucial for physical growth, biological transformation, and maturity. So, in the concept of LTAD (Long Term Athlete Development), sports coaching is referred to as Active Start which is carried out at the age of 0 to 6 years (Varghese et al., 2022). Subsequently, the age of 12 (known as early adolescence) is the timeframe of accelerated adaptation to aerobic exercise. This is also supported by the statement that “battery test” used for talent identification must have a high “quality” in order to differentiate the competence and ability of children (Saward et al., 2020).

Talent identification can be done in two steps: first, at the age of 12-16 years old, teachers at school will evaluate the physical abilities and health of adolescents, then each state will invite these individuals into the second step (A. M. Williams et al.,2020) Pino-ortega et al., 2021; Doncaster et al., 2020). Second, the selected individuals will be reassessed using advanced scientific equipment and the gifted individuals will be selected based on the results (Till & Baker, 2020) (Ford et al., 2020). There are 5 indicators to determine someone’s talent, which are: 1) genetic or inherited factors, 2) indicator of early stage talent progress. 3) evidence of potential talent as an indicator of achievement in sports, 4) the limited talent within certain populations, 5) talent that is specific to particular domains. With a specific kind of talent, it is obviously easier for someone to refer to a particular talent and this can affect the development in their progress of future achievement (Abdullaev, 2022) (Dehghansai et al., 2021). This is supported by NFHS or National Federation of State High School Associations (2008-2009). which stated that from an economic perspective, successful identification and talent development in athletics has the benefit of the multi-billion dollar sports industry, where there are 7.536.753 students participating in athletics annually. Proper identification of athletic talent has many benefits (Khan et al., 2023).

Indonesian athletes who are capable of producing athletes who compete at international level, talent identification in the field of athletic sports needs to be implemented (Satriawan et al., 2023) (Bakhtiar et al., 2023). Along with physical tests, tests that use “battery test” must also be carried out to show the accuracy of the results. Thus, seeing the importance of talent identification and opportunity to achieve sports achievements at international level, especially in indonesia, would be necessary. In this case, PB PASI (The Executive Board of Indonesian Athletic Association) has collaborated with DBL Indonesia, in the Indonesian Students Athletic Championship (SAC) which has been attended by 31.000.000 students from 2.000 schools. Therefore, talent identification in athletic sports needs to be carried out in order to facilitate the training of young athletes through schools in indonesia. In this way, the guidelines in talent identification through anthropometry measurements and competition record results can be used as guidelines in finding potential athletes. Therefore, the analysis of athletic sports needs to be carried out in order to identify athletics athletes in indonesia.

Methods

This research was conducted using the ex-post facto method in the form of tests and measurements. The ex-post facto process is a type of research that does not control variables directly.

Participants

The participants of this research were children between the ages of 15-18 years old from various provinces in indonesia that have been designated as hosts of Student Athletic Championships (SAC) competition, which are: Sumatra, West Java, Bali-Nusa Tenggara, Jakarta-Banten, Central Java, and East Java. The reason for choosing these research locations was due to the fact that these locations were the places which held the athletic competition between students throughout Indonesia. Besides, these provinces were chosen because many athletes who contributed to national athletics came from those places. The prediction test was divided into two sections, consisting anthropometric tests and achievement records in each branch of competitions which consist of 100-meter sprint, 1000-meter middle-distance run, long jump and shot put. As for the anthropometric test, it was conducted in the form of body height test, body weight test, arm span measurement, and leg length measurement. The data were then processed through the entry, coding, processing and analysis processes. Entry is the process of entering the age data, as well as measurements of height and weight into a table that has been made. Afterwards, the results of height and weight measurements were calculated using this formula: BMI = Body Weight (kg) / Height (m)2, with the following categories (Table1, Table 2).

Table 1:Body Mass Index (BMI) The following table shows the name of the test, the tools and units used, as well as the number of assistants:

  Category Body Mass Index
Underweight Severe underweight < 17,0
  Slight degree of underweight 17,0 - 18,4
Ideal Ideal 18,5 - 24,9
Overweight Overweight 25,0-29,9
  Grade 1 overweight 30,0-34,9
  Grade 2 overweight > 35

Table 2:The Name of The Test, Tool, and Unit.

No Test Name Location Tool Unit Assistant
1. Height Room Microtoise Cm 1
2. Weight Room Weight Scales Kg 1
3. Arm span Room Roll Meter Cm 1
4. Leg length Room Roll Meter Cm 1

Site and Time of Research

This research will be conducted in 6 provinces in indonesia and will be carried out over a period of 8 months, from March to October 2024.

Data Collection

The data were collected using a talent prediction test instrument prepared by researchers who had been tested beforehand. The research instrument for predicting children’s talent consisted of 4 anthropometric test items and 1 data of each student’s competition achievement according to the number of competitions followed by them.

Data Analysis

The data analysis technique used is the absolute criteria techniques or criterion-referenced standards from the results of the talent prediction test conducted. The results of data analysis were used as a basis for talent prediction. The data analysis steps that will be carried out are data reduction, making data displays in tabular form, making analysis, presenting the results obtained, and creating a general conclusion of the tendency of the results of the measurements and the results of the competition.

Results

Anthropometric Profile

The Characteristics of Body Mass Index (BMI)

The following are the results of BMI percentage measurement in the 100-meter run, 100-meter middle-distance run, long jump and shot put with a total of 142 talented young athletes taken from 6 provinces in indonesia. The average percentage rate of all athletes’ body weight is 17% in the underweight category, 65% in the ideal category, 9% in the overweight category, 4% in the grade 1 overweight category, and 3% in the grade 2 overweight category (see Table 3). Then, the distribution of height and weight (see Table 4) revealed that the average weight and height in the men’s 100-meter run is 168,9±4,854 cm, 56.63±6.010 kg, and for women is 159,61±6,427 cm, 50.71±7.189 kg. Meanwhile, in the men's 1000-meter run, the average is 168.50±6.793 cm, 56.60±1.646 kg, and for women it is 157.06±6.847 cm, 47.66±4.423 kg. Then, in the men’s long jump, the average is 162.53±5.235 cm, 61.11±5.838 kg and for women it is 162.53±5.235 cm, 50.51±4.853 kg. Followed by men’s shot put, in which the average is 174.67±6.278 cm, 86.94±19.541 kg, and for women it is 164.28±5.592 cm and 71.19±11.117 kg.

Anthropometric’s Characteristics

Table 3:The Percentage Results of BMI Anthropometric Measurements.

No Category Branches of Athletics
100 M M 100M W 1000 M M 1000 M W LJ M LJ W TP M TP W Percentage
1 Underweight 3 7 4 4 1 4 0 0 17%
2 Ideal 15 10 13 14 16 8 8 6 65%
3 Overweight 0 1 1 0 1 0 4 6 9%
4 Obesity 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 4%
5 Obesity 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 3%

The age distribution and competition time result of athletes are presented below (see Table 4). In the men’s 100-meter run, the average is 18.13±.957 years old and the average competition results is 11.63±0.22.0 seconds, for women, the age average is 17.56±1.042 years old and 13.44±.369 seconds. Followed by men’s 1000-meter run, the average age for them is 19.5±1.294, and the average time result is 120.53±.0132 seconds, meanwhile the average age for women is 17.93±.961 years old and the competition result is 180.35±.1746 seconds. Then, the results of the men’s long jump competition, the average age is 17.89±.900 years old and the result of the competition is as far as 5,64±.551 meter. Meanwhile, for the women, the average age is 17.93±.961 years old and the average race results were as far as 4.073±1.124 meter. Followed by the competition results in the shot put, the average age is 17.89±.758 years old and the race results is as far as 11.640± 1.497 m2, while for women, the average age is 17.83±.857 years old and the result is 7.428±2.286 m2.

Table 4: Average Athletes’ Anthropometric Test Results and Race Results.

Variables Results (100-meter run)
Gender
Age
Height/cm
Weight/kg
Arm span/cm
Leg length/cm
Competition results/meter
Men (n=16)
18.13±.957
168,9±4,854
56.63±6.010
170.06±6.148
84.13±6.054
11.63± .220
Women (n=18)
17.56±1.042
159,61±6,427
50.71±7.189
162.56±8.276
80.44±6.653
13.44±.369
Variables Results (1000-meter run)
Gender
Age
Height/cm
Weight/kg
Arm span/cm
Leg length/cm
Competition results/meter
Men (n=18)
19,5±1.294
168.50±6.793
56.60±1.646
166.11±22.313
85.50±5.491
120.53±.0132
Women (n=18)
17.28±1.227
157.06±6.847
47.66±4.423
158.50±6.419
79.67±6.774
180.35±.1746
Variables Results (Long Jump)
Gender
Age
Height/cm
Weight/kg
Arm span/cm
Leg length/cm
Competition results/meter
Men (n=18)
17.89±.900
162.53±5.235
61.11±5.838
174.11±6.902
86.72±6.755
5,64±.551
Women (n=14)
17.93±.961
162.53±5.235
50.51±4.853
162.13±6.728
82.27±6.408
4.073±1.124
Variables Results (Shot Put)
Gender
Age
Height/cm
Weight/kg
Arm span/cm
Leg length/cm
Competition results/meter
Men (n=18)
17.89±.758
174.67±6.278
86.94±19.541
179.22±8.300
87.67±54.706
11.640± 1.497
Women (n=18)
17.83±.857
164.28±5.592
71.19±11.117
162.22±16.075
83.28±53.271
7.428±2.286
Notes: The results are presented based on the mean ± standard deviation.

The Average Arm Span and Leg Length

The average of arm span and leg length in the men’s 100-meter run is 170.06±6.148/cm, 84.13±6.054/cm, as for women it is 162.56±8.276/cm, 80.44±6.653/cm. Meanwhile, in the 1000-meter run it is 166.11±22.313/cm, 85.50±5.491/cm. Then, the men’s long jump is 174.11±6.902/cm, 86.72±6.755/cm, whereas the women's is 158.50±6.419/cm, 79.67±6.774/cm. Next, in the shot put, the men is 179.22±8.300/cm, 87.67±54.706/cm, meanwhile the women is 162.22±16.075/cm, 83.28±53.271/cm (Table 4).

The results are declared based on the percentage rate of all athletes selected for all sports. The following are the average results of anthropometric measurements consisting of height, weight, arm span, and leg length of potential talented athletes competing in athletics at SAC which are deemed as ideal and suitable (Table 4, Figure 1).

The Correlation Between Finish Time and Runners' Anthropometric Variables

In the men's and women's 100-meter run, there is a significant positive correlation between height, arm span, and leg length with running time results (p<0.05). However, body weight is prone to negative correlation with running time results (p>0.05). In the men's and women's 1000-meter run, there is a significant positive correlation between height, arm span, and leg length with running time (p<0.05), but age and weight are negatively correlated with running time (p>0.05). In the men's and women's long jumps, there is a significant positive correlation between height, arm span, and leg length with jumping results (p<0.05), but age and weight are negatively correlated with jumping results (p>0.05). In the men's and women's shot put, there is a significant positive correlation between body weight, height, arm span and leg length with the result of the shot (p<0.05) (Table 5).

Table 5: The Correlation between the Results and the Anthropometric Measurements.

  Variables Results
Women Men
r p-value r p-value
100-meter run
Age
Height, cm
Weight, kg
Arm span, cm
Leg length, cm
-.292
-.378
.383
-.217
.001
.325
.319
.301
.307
.822
.127
.017
-.143
.177
1.000
.449
.135
.193
.007
.288
                           1000-meter run
Age
Height, cm
Weight, kg
Arm span, cm
Leg length, cm
.438
-.736
.301
.423
1.000
.687
.531
.371
.470
.739
1.000
-.422
.062
-.004
.119
.725
.224
.381
.011
.382
                           Long Jump
Age
Height, cm
Weight, kg
Arm span, cm
Leg length, cm
-.004
-.311
-.306
-.005
.002
.826
.956
.363
.828
.610
-.074
-.418
1.000
-.051
1.000
-.651
1.332
-.358
-.436
-2.127
                           Shot Put
Age
Height, cm
Weight, kg
Arm span, cm
Leg length, cm
-.128
-.331
.369
-.032
1.000
.985
.011
.152
.050
.163
.034
-.404
.175
.150
1.000
.387
.181
.317
.099
.559
Note: p<0.05 was considered significant (*); r = correlation coefficient
s

Table 6:Results of Multiple Linear Regression Analysis of Predictor Variables in Men and Women.

Men Women
Predictor Variable Standardized Beta (β) P-Value Predictor Variable Standardized Beta (β) P-Value
100-meter run
Age
Height, cm
Weight, kg
Arm Span, cm
Leg Length, cm
Results
.177
.452
-.300
-.843
-.223
.449
.135
.193
.007
.288
Age
Height, cm
Weight, kg
Arm Span, cm
Leg Length, cm
Results
.294
-.593
-.395
.592
.080
.325
.319
.301
.307
.822
1000-meter run
Age
Height, cm
Weight, kg
Arm Span, cm
Leg Length, cm
Results
-.071
-.335
.204
-.641
.211
.725
.224
.381
.011
.382
Age
Height, cm
Weight, kg
Arm Span, cm
Leg Length, cm
Results
-.156
-.519
.370
.445
-.181
.687
.531
.371
.470
.739
Long Jump
Age
Height, cm
Weight, kg
Arm Span, cm
Leg Length, cm
Results
-.173
.681
-.095
-.203
-.694
-.651
1.332
-.358
-.436
-2.127
Age
Height, cm
Weight, kg
Arm Span, cm
Leg Length, cm
Results
-.305
-.175
1.134
.809
-.709
.826
.956
.363
.828
.610
Shot Put
Age
Height, cm
Weight, kg
Arm Span, cm
Leg Length, cm
Results
.216
-.886
-.250
1.025
.178
.387
.181
.317
.099
.559
Age
Height, cm
Weight, kg
Arm Span, cm
Leg Length, cm
Results
-.005
.893
-.490
-.649
-.368
.985
.011
.152
.050
.163

Regression Analysis of Predictor Variables on the Finish Time

Multicollinearity tests were conducted between each predictor variable for the presence of their correlation using the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF). The correlation between anthropometric variables and athlete finish time was clarified using multiple regression analysis. In the process, variables such as age, height, weight, arm span and leg length were taken as predictor variables in the regression model. However, anthropometry of men and women athletes in the 100-meter and 1000-meter run appeared to have a significant positive predictive influence on finishing time (negative on performance (p>0.05). The scatter diagram with regression lines and prediction intervals is shown in Figure 1, indicating that there is a positive correlation between leg length and height of men and women runners that affects the duration of race results.

riped-Bar

Figure 1. Bar Chart of the Results of Anthropometric Measurement.

The scatter diagram with regression lines and prediction intervals in Figure 1 shows that increasing arm circumference is positively associated with the running time of each women athlete (Figure 2-5).

riped-scatter

Figure 2. A scatter diagram of the finish time and anthropometry of men and women 100-meter runners shows a linear regression line and prediction interval.

s
riped-diagram

Figure 3. A scatter diagram of the finishing time and anthropometry of men and women 1000-meter runners shows a linear regression line and prediction interval.

riped-finish

Figure 4. A scatter diagram of finish time and anthropometry of men runners and women long jump shows a linear regression line and prediction interval.

riped-finishing

Figure 5. A scatter diagram of the finishing time and anthropometry of men and women shot puts shows linear regression lines and prediction intervals.

Discussion

For this study, the participants were high school students who had not experienced participating in athletic competitions, but the anthropometric and the results of the competition were predicted to be talented athletes, which a selection had been conducted previously in each region that held the Student Athletic Competition (SAC). This is in line with the previous research that has been done. First, talent identification will be beneficial in determining one of the expertise sports. The advantages of performance analysis as a preferred measure of sport-specific skills in the talent identification process (Waldron & Worsfold, 2010). Second, measurements for basic skills development assessment will most likely help the transition of beginner to professional talented players (Pearce et al., 2019). Third, the most talented young athletes can be identified according to the rank on estimated ability regardless of age (Anderson, 2014). Earlier onset and higher intensity of specific training and competition, and more extensive involvement in institutional talent promotion programs (Vaeyens et al., 2009). Therefore, it is crucial to identify talent in sports by taking anthropometric measurements beforehand.

In this study, the height and leg length of men and women students had a positive correlation with the 100-meter and 1000-meter race finish time, but the weight had a negative correlation and not necessarily the 100-meter and 1000-meter race finish time. In addition, the significance of age did not warrant being a predictor as a covariant. However, no statistically significant correlation was observed between age and runner finish time in men and women athletes. Meanwhile, in the long jump, men’s and women’s height, arm span, and leg length had a positive correlation. Anthropometry has a positive correlation in achieving maximum race results, but age and weight are not guaranteed as predictors of winning the race. Furthermore, in the shot put in men and women, the height, weight, arm span, and leg length have a positive correlation in achieving achievement. Anthropometry has a positive correlation in achieving maximum race results, but age is not guaranteed as a predictor of winning the race.

In addition, the ideal anthropometry is one of the important things in starting specialization in certain sports. By taking anthropometric measurements from the beginning, it is expected that potential athletes with the identification of sports will be found so that athlete development in athletic sports can be developed early on. Anthropometry is needed to get maximum results and achievements from athletes, so anthropometric measurements are needed to obtain the ideal anthropometry form that suits the characteristics of the branch of sports in athletics (Anup et al., 2014). Afterward, training and nutrition are also a form of support in starting specialization in certain sports with anthropometric measurements in advance.

In this study, the correlation between anthropometry consisting of measurements of height, weight, arm span and leg length in 4 branches of sports in athletics used as one of the identification predictors for the selection of talented athletes, especially high school students whose average age is 16-18 years old both women and men. Previously there were several similar studies that examined the identification trials of talented athletes associated with experience, training, nutrition and quality coaches.

There was a significant negative correlation between age and race times and finishes for men and women in the four athletics studied. There was no significant age-performance correlation that might indicate that the narrow age range in the athletes of this study may prevent the effect of age on the result.

Whereas height was not correlated in the 100-meter and 1000-meter runs, thus having a bivariate effect on finishing time, showing no significant correlation with finishing time when its covariant effects such as body weight, thigh length, and leg length were controlled, but a positive correlation was evident in the long jump and shot put. Consequently, it could be advantageous for relatively lighter, shorter/average and smaller runners to perform better (to finish earlier). However, despite significant weight and height effects and covariance effects, none of them showed significant performance effects when each was examined with appropriate covariance controls. This was valid for both the men and women runners. It means that any influence of weight, height and body mass index on performance is only significant in the appropriate covariance effects.

Furthermore, in this study, especially in the 100-meter and 1000-meter running numbers, arm span and leg length in men and women did not have a significant correlation with running time (p>0.05). This is in accordance with research from a study conducted (Dessalew et al., 2019) on the correlation between performance and endurance anthropometric variables of Caucasian men runners, finding a positive correlation between longer time leg length (total lower limbs, in context) and time performance. However, the long jump and shot put showed a positive correlation with race results.

As a result, 17-20 years of age students can be identified as talented in sports. Sports coaches and scientists should use minimum scores and individual discriminant analysis to identify some beginner athletes for tests in identification. Then physical fitness data or specific race results and anthropometric data increase the accuracy of predicting the development of the talent process in young athletes. By classifying the test results, the coach can also decide which athlete will be deployed in a particular sport. In addition, the coach must consider it with the right training so that athletes with identified talents can achieve maximum performance.

Coaches implicitly and explicitly select beginner athletes based on their character and utilize their personal values (Gäbler et al., 2023). Skill assessments are apparently to be an objective and scalable part of talent development programs (Rosevear & Cassidy, 2019). Assessing the quality of multi-dimensional performance is conducted when identifying talented team sports (Koopmann et al., 2020). Lastly, mental assessment and goal management skills can also predict future achievement outcomes (Woods et al., 2016)

Conclusion

In this study, some anthropometry measurements, especially age, did not correlate with the race results, especially in the 100-meter and 100-meter running numbers. However, in the branch of sports in athletic long jump and shot put, the height and leg length are very influential on the results of jumping and throwing during the competition.

There is no single anthropometric variable that showed a partial correlation with running time without its corresponding covariance with running time. The results of this study indicate that the morphological characteristics of beginner athletes have a significant influence on the results of the competition in the 100-meter and 1000-meter runs, long jump, and shot put to achieve better results. Anthropometric parameters may be useful for selection, prediction, and improving running performance as well as for preventing injury and health risk assessment. From the results of the previous research, anthropometry is related to the improvement of athletes' performance. With anthropometric measurements and physical performance, it is expected athlete talent can be identified in certain sports.

References

Abdullaev, F. T. (2022). Theoretical and Practical Basis of Determining Fitness for Sports. 12(2720), 121–128.

Anderson, A. (2014). Early Identification of Talent in Cyclo-Cross by Estimating Age-Independent Ability via Probit Regression. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 14(1), 153–161.

Anup, A., Nahida, P., Islam, R. N., & Kitab, A. (2014). Importance of Anthropometric Characteristics in Athletic Performance from the Perspective of Bangladeshi National Level Athletes’ Performance and Body Type. American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 2(4), 123–127.

Bakhtiar, S., Syahputra, R., Putri, L. P., & Pion, J. (2023). Original Article Sports talent profile of 7-12 years old: Preliminary study of talent identification in Indonesia. 23(12), 3167–3177. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2023.12361

Chunmei, C. (2021). Research Progress on Selection Methods of Volleyball Players. J Adv Sport Phys Edu, 8642, 172–181.

Crewther, B. T., Staniak, Z., Cook, C. J., & Pastuszak, A. (2024). Disaggregating the influence of maturity status on training, anthropometric, performance, skeletal periphery, and hormonal factors in athletic boys. Physiology & Behavior, 114502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114502

Dehghansai, N., Pinder, R. A., & Baker, J. (2021). “Looking for a Golden Needle in the Haystack”: Perspectives on Talent Identification and Development in Paralympic Sport. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 3(April), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2021.635977

Dessalew, G. W., Woldeyes, D. H., & Abegaz, B. A. (2019). The Relationship Between Anthropometric Variables and Race Performance. Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, 10, 209–216.

Doncaster, G., Medina, D., Drobnic, F., & Gómez-díaz, A. J. (2020). Appreciating Factors Beyond the Physical in Talent Identification and Development : Insights From the FC Barcelona Sporting Model. 2(July), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2020.00091

Ford, P. R., Bordonau, J. L. D., Bonanno, D., Tavares, J., Groenendijk, C., Fink, C., Gualtieri, D., Gregson, W., Varley, M. C., Weston, M., Lolli, L., Platt, D., & Di Salvo, V. (2020). A survey of talent identification and development processes in the youth academies of professional soccer clubs from around the world. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(11–12), 1269–1278. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1752440

Gäbler, M., Prieske, O., Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Hortobágyi, T., Warnke, T., & Granacher, U. (2023). Measures of Physical Fitness Improve Prediction of Kayak and Canoe Sprint Performance in Young Kayakers and Canoeists. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 37(6), 1264–1270.

Horne, E., Woolf, J., & Green, C. (2022). Relationship dynamics between parents and coaches: are they failing young athletes? Edward. Managing Sport and Leisure, 27(3), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2020.1779114

Junior, D. B. R., Werneck, F. Z., Oliveira, H. Z., & Panza, P. S. (2021). From Talent Identification to Novo Basquete Brasil ( NBB ): Multifactorial Analysis of the Career Progression in Youth Brazilian Elite Basketball. 12(March), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.617563

Khan, N. J., Ahamad, G., Reyaz, N., & Naseem, M. (2023). Optimal feature selection for cricket talent identification. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration, 10(98), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.19101/IJATEE.2021.876300

Koopmann, T., Faber, I., Baker, J., & Schorer, J. (2020). Assessing Technical Skills in Talented Youth Athletes: A Systematic Review. Sports Medicine, 50, 1593–1611.

Morais, J. E., Barbosa, T. M., Forte, P., & Silva, A. J. (2021). Young Swimmers ’ Anthropometrics , Biomechanics , Energetics , and Efficiency as Underlying Performance Factors : A Systematic Narrative Review. 12(September). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.691919

Pearce, L. A., Sinclair, W. H., Leicht, A. S., & Woods, C. T. (2019). Passing and tackling qualities discriminate developmental level in a rugby league talent pathway. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 19(6), 985–998.

Pino-ortega, J., Rojas-valverde, D., & Carlos, D. G. (2021). Training Design , Performance Analysis , and Talent Identification — A Systematic Review about the Most Relevant Variables through the Principal Component Analysis in Soccer , Basketball , and Rugby. 1–19.

Ronkainen, N., Aggerholm, K., Allen-collinson, J., Ryba, V., Ronkainen, N., Aggerholm, K., Allen-collinson, J., & Allen-collinson, J. (2023). Beyond life-skills : talented athletes , existential learning and ( Un ) learning the life of an athlete ABSTRACT. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 15(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2022.2037694

Rosevear, R., & Cassidy, T. (2019). The role of character in talent identification and development in New Zealand rugby union. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 14(3), 406–418.

Satriawan, R., Festiawan, R., Kurniawan, D. D., Putra, F., Susanto, E., & Bayok, M. (2023). Talent Identification Predicting in Athletics : A Case Study in Indonesia. 11(1), 1–11.

Saward, C., Hulse, M., Morris, J. G., Goto, H., Sunderland, C., & Nevill, M. E. (2020). Longitudinal Physical Development of Future Professional Male Soccer Players: Implications for Talent Identification and Development? Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 2(October), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2020.578203

Till, K., & Baker, J. (2020). Challenges and [Possible] Solutions to Optimizing Talent Identification and Development in Sport. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(April), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00664

Toselli, S., Campa, F., Latessa, P. M., Greco, G., Loi, A., Grigoletto, A., & Zaccagni, L. (2021). Differences in maturity and anthropometric and morphological characteristics among young male basketball and soccer players and non-players. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(8), 3902.

Vaeyens, R., Güllich, A., Warr, C. R., & Philippaerts, R. (2009). Talent identification and promotion programmes of Olympic athletes. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27(13), 1367–1380.

Varghese, M., Ruparell, S., & LaBella, C. (2022). Youth athlete development models: a narrative review. Sports Health, 14(1), 20–29.

Waldron, M., & Worsfold, P. (2010). Differences in the Game Specific Skills of Elite and Sub-Elite Youth Football Players: Implications for Talent Identification. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 10(1), 9–24.

Williams, A. M., Ford, P. R., Drust, B., Williams, A. M., Ford, P. R., & Drust, B. (2020). Talent identification and development in soccer since the millennium ABSTRACT. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(11–12), 1199–1210. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1766647

Williams, G., Macnamara, Á., & Kearney, P. E. (2020). “ I Didn ’ t Make It , but …”: Deselected Athletes ’ Experiences of the Talent Development Pathway. 2(March), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2020.00024

Woods, C. T., Raynor, A. J., Bruce, L., McDonald, Z., & Robertson, S. (2016). The application of a multi-dimensional assessment approach to talent identification in Australian football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 34(14), 1340–1345.

Zamirovna, J. V. (2021). Methods for Selecting Junior and Cadets Athletes by Morphofunctional Criteria. Central Asian Journal of Medical and Natural Science, 18, 87–91.

Top