Danah Mansour Al Mutib
Medical student, Saudi Arabia
Publications
-
Research Article
COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE AND CONVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES IN OTOLOGIC SURGERY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
Author(s): Moamen Abdelfadil Ismail*, Faisal Abdullah Ibrahim ALSHYER, Ghala saeed alahmari, Alhanouf Oudah Alasmari, Ariam Ali Muarif, Ghaida Mohammed A Alshehri, Ghadeer Yahya Aljaber, Danah Mansour Al Mutib, Renad Mohammed Algosadi Alshehri, Ali Hussain Aldukain, IBRAHIM AHMED ALGHAMDI, Nouf Mohammed Alqarn and Ghanaym AlMazrouei
Background: Minimally invasive techniques (MITs) in otologic surgery, such as endoscopic ear surgery (EES), laser-assisted procedures, and robotic-assisted surgery, have gained popularity due to their advantages in reducing surgical trauma, improving precision, and enhancing recovery outcomes. However, a comprehensive comparison of MITs with conventional microscopic ear surgery (MES) regarding safety, efficacy, and longterm patient satisfaction remains underexplored. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of MITs versus conventional techniques in otologic surgery. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science, following PRISMA guidelines. Studies comparing MITs and MES in patients undergoing otologic surgery were included. Key outco.. Read More»